For Immediate Release:
22 May 2018
Dr Manilal Valliyate; [email protected]
Nirali Gada; [email protected]
New PETA India Investigation Confirms That Dogs Continue to Be Denied Exercise, Socialisation, and Other Basic Necessities
Chennai – Yesterday, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court of India presenting fresh evidence of cruelty to dogs who are imprisoned and denied exercise and socialisation at the Tamil Nadu Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries Department’s dog-breeding unit (DBU) at Saidapet, Chennai. Despite being a government centre, the DBU breeds dogs to sell to the public. PETA India’s investigation report, which is available upon request, also revealed that the state government provided the Supreme Court with obviously fabricated photographs supposedly showing proper treatment of animals, following a petition challenging the 2016 order of the Madras High Court, which directed the closure of the DBU for not providing dogs with basic care and for not meeting the terms and conditions set by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI), a statutory body that operates under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change and registers breeders.
PETA India’s investigator visited the DBU from 12 to 14 March 2018 and documented that none of the adult dogs or puppies were allowed to play, exercise, or socialise at any point in the areas of the facility designated for this purpose. The photos and video footage taken by the group prove that this is in contradiction to the DBU’s claim in its daily activity chart, which was filed through an affidavit in the Supreme Court and states that dogs are taken for exercise and socialisation for two hours in the morning, from 7:15 to 9:15, and two hours in the afternoon, from 3 to 5. The dog socialisation ground was in a state of utter neglect, and photographs show that it’s entrance gate and the plant containers located on either side of the gate were littered with empty liquor bottles and lids, plastic disposable glasses, snack packets, and accumulated dry leaves, showing that the ground has probably been unused for several months except for unsavoury activities.
In 2017, the Tamil Nadu state government claimed before the Supreme Court that DBU employees personally exercise each dog in a 3,000-square-foot exercise paddock and submitted photographs, which PETA India noticed were obviously Photoshopped. A basic examination reveals inconsistences, such as missing objects – including part of the fence, a pole that supports the fence, and the middle portion of a leash on a dog being walked by a man – and a layer of green grass that was apparently mistakenly added onto a blue-coloured pole, which all indicate that the images were poorly altered. PETA India’s report points out that the state government filed these fabricated photos with a view to misleading the court regarding the actual conditions in the DBU.
Such constant confinement of dogs as has been documented at the DBU is an apparent violation of Rule 24 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Dog Breeding and Marketing) Rules, 2017, and Section 11(g) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.
“The dog breeding unit has shown yet again that it either can’t or won’t provide dogs with basic necessities like exercise and socialisation,” says PETA India Senior Legal Associate Swati Sumbly. “This cruel dog prison has falsified evidence before the Supreme Court, and PETA India is calling for it to be shut down immediately.”
PETA India – whose motto reads, in part, that “animals are not ours to abuse in any way” – began its court case against the DBU after a 2013 inspection authorised by the AWBI revealed that dogs were constantly confined to kennels with no exercise, socialisation, or grooming. In November 2014, following an order of the Madras High Court, a second inspection by AWBI revealed that dogs were still kept constantly jailed and that many suffered from tick bites, dermatitis, and/or mange. In December 2016, the High Court directed the closure of the DBU within two months. In January 2017, the Tamil Nadu state government challenged the order before the Supreme Court, and in February 2017, the Supreme Court stayed the order. In March 2017, the state filed an 18-page affidavit, along with 13 allegedly recent photographs of the DBU, claiming that it was in compliance with India’s animal-welfare laws – a claim that PETA India is now exposing as false.
For more information, please visit PETAIndia.com.